Photo of Wystan Ackerman

I am a partner in Robinson+Cole’s Insurance Appeals team. I have a national insurance appellate practice and have been involved in over 150 appeals, including appeals in every regional federal circuit, as well as in state supreme and/or appellate courts in 16 states, and the U.S. Supreme Court. I regularly represent national and local insurance industry associations as amici curiae in appellate and supreme courts and have been involved in many of the most significant insurance coverage-related appeals over the last twenty years. I am a former chair of the Appellate Section of the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel (FDCC) and served on the pro bono panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. I also chair the firm’s Professional Development Committee. Read more about Wystan.

A recent Missouri Court of Appeals decision provides helpful precedent for liability insurers facing legacy environmental claims and class actions. The court strictly construed the policy period, concluding that claims based on conduct or injury occurring after the expiration of the policy were not covered, even if the underlying contamination began earlier.

In Certain Underwriters

Welcome to Robinson+Cole’s Covering Appeals blog, a new resource that analyzes the latest developments in insurance coverage appeals and provides an in-depth analysis of industry trends.

Our Insurance Appeals team is known for handling cutting-edge and precedent-setting insurance appeals nationwide, having been involved in key cases arising from the COVID-19 business interruption insurance litigation, Chinese-manufactured

The Supreme Courts of Pennsylvania and North Carolina have issued two of what are presumably the last state supreme court decisions in COVID-19 business interruption insurance cases. While they reached split results (with the Pennsylvania court ruling for the insurer and the North Carolina court ruling for policyholders in a case without a virus exclusion)

Hawai’i is generally an unfavorable jurisdiction for insurers given its “legal uncertainty rule,” under which there is a duty to defend if a determinative issue is nationally disputed and not yet decided in Hawai’i. However, as the Hawai’i Supreme Court recently clarified, that rule does not apply if the coverage issue debated nationally is not